03-06-2015, 04:44 AM
(03-06-2015, 03:57 AM)Justice Wrote: This was actually a smart group of people, except for that one who seemed to have an agenda from the beginning! Â But I cannot understand why the Judge did not replace that juror when she was using that stupid Lifetime movie as 'evidence', when it should not have even been considered in those deliberations! Â They told the Judge, but she still let that juror stay. Â That seems very unethical, if not illegal, to me. Â But, I'm not a lawyer. Â
I don't know about all of you, but I really look forward to Dr. Randle's articles after this is all over!
_____________________________________________________________________________________
The jurists seemed quite intelligent. I listened to the reporters questioning them. I feel as though they based their decision not only on the evidence, but lack of credibility to the defense/Arias and understood the qualifiers for the death penalty. They pegged Arias right!
As to the "hold out" juror, Claudia, I just read where her husband was interviewed and Claudia believed she was being "bullied." What she wrote to JSS is still a mystery - the answer must be in her message as to why JSS made the determination that she did to keep Claudia.
Like you, I'm really looking forward to Dr. Randle's articles after the video taping of the penalty phase are released. And Dr. Randle's book, when done, will be the only one I will be reading!!