03-27-2015, 12:27 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-27-2015, 02:32 AM by Lunarscope.)
Nern well said' we have the timing of when the paper was released' it was exactly when the 11 were walking into interview room and that was just after the 11 were informed' by the court, that JII had published all their names including middle names, plus 2 jurors Facebook names, then we have (it's important) that the first trials jurors had their names and Facebook names posted on Jodi support blogs a month before deliberations, the page released was the page discussed in the judges chambers' it was both posted and swiftly deleted' but #17's information quickly flooded the retweets, we don't know who released #17 but we know that the department of justice will find out what reporter released the papers information because the department of justice is actively investigating as we speak, that much is lockset!
Their is a correction that relates' and accuracy is important, the daily show or something that was favorited by #17 Â Â was reported only in existence since December' Â Â Â but it had been a prior news show closed and reopened, Â Â theirs a possibility of the show having reused the web link, Â Â Â highly unlikely due to expanse of time but also a possibility that #17 just never deleted from favorites and that is the tidbit that had me leaning towards culpability, note I never assured blame' just posted possible agenda, my assumption still stands but I fear possibility of bearing false witness' so I will keep #17 under scrutiny' because of her liking Nancy and channel 12 and 10, plus I do believe Martinez filed a complaint motion' that was reentered unrevised days later.
___________
From Cathy Court Chatter
"Supplemental" to motion to change counsel.Where's the motion? Change counsel for what? Of course sealed. #jodiarias pic.twitter.com/Q5IK0wHgx7
A commenter then said;
The date says March 23, 2015, change counsel for what? I don't get it, Hodiwho is off to Perryville soon.
And another said; Justice4Travis; JSS better deny Jodi if she wants to go pro se again, just wants phone privileges back!
@ So over the weekend' first thing monday the "Jodi Motion" was filed' but JSS sealed the "Jodi Motion", note Nurmi and Willmott are not appellate attorneys' so their done with Jodi on the 13th, but motions filed must be addressed/answered
Link is a very narrow window' so going to the link doesn't give more or less filed motions (everything important is above), I take it that Nurmi gives Jodi the my Secretary can take your calls treatment and Willmott wants no part of taking Jodi calls with MDLR having told Jodi that she is broke, plus like the talking = Jodi wants a Hersey bar' instead of jail slop, so she wants a ride to the courthouse!
Their is a correction that relates' and accuracy is important, the daily show or something that was favorited by #17 Â Â was reported only in existence since December' Â Â Â but it had been a prior news show closed and reopened, Â Â theirs a possibility of the show having reused the web link, Â Â Â highly unlikely due to expanse of time but also a possibility that #17 just never deleted from favorites and that is the tidbit that had me leaning towards culpability, note I never assured blame' just posted possible agenda, my assumption still stands but I fear possibility of bearing false witness' so I will keep #17 under scrutiny' because of her liking Nancy and channel 12 and 10, plus I do believe Martinez filed a complaint motion' that was reentered unrevised days later.
___________
From Cathy Court Chatter
"Supplemental" to motion to change counsel.Where's the motion? Change counsel for what? Of course sealed. #jodiarias pic.twitter.com/Q5IK0wHgx7
A commenter then said;
The date says March 23, 2015, change counsel for what? I don't get it, Hodiwho is off to Perryville soon.
And another said; Justice4Travis; JSS better deny Jodi if she wants to go pro se again, just wants phone privileges back!
@ So over the weekend' first thing monday the "Jodi Motion" was filed' but JSS sealed the "Jodi Motion", note Nurmi and Willmott are not appellate attorneys' so their done with Jodi on the 13th, but motions filed must be addressed/answered
Link is a very narrow window' so going to the link doesn't give more or less filed motions (everything important is above), I take it that Nurmi gives Jodi the my Secretary can take your calls treatment and Willmott wants no part of taking Jodi calls with MDLR having told Jodi that she is broke, plus like the talking = Jodi wants a Hersey bar' instead of jail slop, so she wants a ride to the courthouse!