03-28-2015, 05:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-28-2015, 05:41 PM by Lunarscope.)
No Nerm' A Judge writes judgements by citing case law, I do not fault any determinations JSS printed (available) to date, but if she wasn't smart she wouldn't be a judge or very smart being a judge in a DP case, I see human frailty.
I stand by with 100% certainty the facial expression I witnessed as a gut reaction of shock' it is the only instance of JSS reaction that I converse or realized.
Repeating' simply put' Jodi had nothing but lies to support her case, evident on the day she arrived in Mesa under arrest. This trial should have been over in 6 weeks at most' 4 weeks is my assessment.
JSS wasted precious court time on nonsense' Jodi lies' pretrial that accumulated into a extremely long first trial, given that' JSS still failed realization by allowing a unheard of 18 days of Jodi lies, I see no backbone. Compiled by slanderous deception unchecked.
Their's been No judicial discretion exampled yet.
I only expect that a high profile trial was beyond her capacity' on the first Nancy Grace in court day JSS acted starstruck' just repeating what I posted a very long time ago.
I do not see a single motion reply beyond the scope of how all judges post motions and judgements, nothing beyond the norm, we can fault JSS reasonings' but we cannot claim Nurmi (skilled verbage) motions were different than JSS (skilled verbage) decisions!
Adding-in' we are hearing nothing from either jury on why they voted what' just the after trial statement. Why isn't the first jury foreman jumping on the news yelling I told you so, their is a silence relating to both juries, we hear #17 complaining about her being harrassed' she is under investigation, so for reason' I wait.
But explain why the rest are quiet, they earned their 5 minutes of fame, plus the last jury are strangely silent, their must be a court order involved' which is in the realm of possibility of judicial control, the jurors must respect the courts and the courts are investigating the court!
I stand by with 100% certainty the facial expression I witnessed as a gut reaction of shock' it is the only instance of JSS reaction that I converse or realized.
Repeating' simply put' Jodi had nothing but lies to support her case, evident on the day she arrived in Mesa under arrest. This trial should have been over in 6 weeks at most' 4 weeks is my assessment.
JSS wasted precious court time on nonsense' Jodi lies' pretrial that accumulated into a extremely long first trial, given that' JSS still failed realization by allowing a unheard of 18 days of Jodi lies, I see no backbone. Compiled by slanderous deception unchecked.
Their's been No judicial discretion exampled yet.
I only expect that a high profile trial was beyond her capacity' on the first Nancy Grace in court day JSS acted starstruck' just repeating what I posted a very long time ago.
I do not see a single motion reply beyond the scope of how all judges post motions and judgements, nothing beyond the norm, we can fault JSS reasonings' but we cannot claim Nurmi (skilled verbage) motions were different than JSS (skilled verbage) decisions!
Adding-in' we are hearing nothing from either jury on why they voted what' just the after trial statement. Why isn't the first jury foreman jumping on the news yelling I told you so, their is a silence relating to both juries, we hear #17 complaining about her being harrassed' she is under investigation, so for reason' I wait.
But explain why the rest are quiet, they earned their 5 minutes of fame, plus the last jury are strangely silent, their must be a court order involved' which is in the realm of possibility of judicial control, the jurors must respect the courts and the courts are investigating the court!