Lunarscope,
You stated....
"I don't think it will matter what JSS does' if the Twitter-talk has merits = Jodi wanting a different Prison, and again I believe Jodi needs to be put in a Super-Max for her own protection' plus the protection of everyone she effects in prison or her supporter cult.
See Perryville is a Overcrowded Minimum Security Prison, Inmates are first put into Solitary for 60 days = their system = this year reduced to 30 days then working, the budget-cuts are dramatic, they may-as-well start building her customized coffin' she has guards and inmates threatening repercussions' in a Violent Corrupt Facility, vigilanteism reflects unjust by historians."
I feel Arias needs to go to where she is sent after her sentencing is rendered. I do not believe she needs protection at this stage and I do not think others need protection from her. That will all be determined AFTER she has spent some time in Perryville.
It is my understanding that Arias will be in Maximum Security in Perryville for a minimum of 2 years and with absolutely PERFECT behaviour she then can be moved to Maximum Security Closed Custody for another 2 years. this means she can have a roommate. After these 2 years with PERFECT behaviour she could be moved to General Population.
During these 4 years (minimum), yes, she can have a bit of freedom, possible jobs, etc. but for the first 2 years, she will have that freedom ALL ALONE.
Also, your reference to Arias' behaviour while in Estrella will be reviewed and not go unnoticed by JSS. Her behaviour while in jail is an indication of what to expect from her once she gets to Perryville.
The fact that Arias refused a Pre-Sentencing Interview clearly shows that she continues to hide information and tries to manipulate the system. Again, this will not go unnoticed by JSS.
By delaying her sentencing for 30 days, she actually "cooked her own goose". Added to information to be used by JSS in determining the sentence are the restrictions now on Arias AND the deplorable reasons for them - such as recruiting minors to break the law.
For me, the most obvious reasons for LWOP is Arias' lack of remorse for her crime AND her vilifying Travis, the victim, in her defense.
JSS sees this too.
----------------------------------------------------------
FYI
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2012/04/12/20120412arizona-prison-clemency.html
"From 1913, when Arizona established a board of pardons and paroles, until 1993, fewer than 60 inmates a year applied for commutation, on average. In 1993, the state adopted so-called "truth in sentencing" laws, which effectively abolished parole. The new code requires offenders to serve at least 85 percent of their sentence before becoming eligible for community supervision; for many felonies, 100 percent of the sentence must be served. The laws, along with mandatory minimums that took discretion in sentencing out of the hands of judges, left commutation as the only avenue for most offenders to seek a reduced sentence..."
-------------------------------------------------------------
https://boec.az.gov/
ARIZONA BOARD OF EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY
"The Board's Mission
The mission of the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency is to ensure public safety by considering and granting parole to inmates who are certified by the Department of Corrections and who appear not to pose a threat to society and recommending to the Governor only those executive clemency actions that are in the best interests of the citizens of Arizona.
The Board’s Purpose
The Board conducts monthly parole hearings for inmates who were convicted of offenses committed on or before January 1, 1994. Hearings may also be held to consider Work Furlough, Home Arrest, Absolute Discharge from Imprisonment or from Parole Supervision: Parole Rescission; and Parole Revocation requests. The Board also conducts hearings for clemency actions that include Pardon, Commutation of Sentence and Reprieve."
You stated....
"I don't think it will matter what JSS does' if the Twitter-talk has merits = Jodi wanting a different Prison, and again I believe Jodi needs to be put in a Super-Max for her own protection' plus the protection of everyone she effects in prison or her supporter cult.
See Perryville is a Overcrowded Minimum Security Prison, Inmates are first put into Solitary for 60 days = their system = this year reduced to 30 days then working, the budget-cuts are dramatic, they may-as-well start building her customized coffin' she has guards and inmates threatening repercussions' in a Violent Corrupt Facility, vigilanteism reflects unjust by historians."
I feel Arias needs to go to where she is sent after her sentencing is rendered. I do not believe she needs protection at this stage and I do not think others need protection from her. That will all be determined AFTER she has spent some time in Perryville.
It is my understanding that Arias will be in Maximum Security in Perryville for a minimum of 2 years and with absolutely PERFECT behaviour she then can be moved to Maximum Security Closed Custody for another 2 years. this means she can have a roommate. After these 2 years with PERFECT behaviour she could be moved to General Population.
During these 4 years (minimum), yes, she can have a bit of freedom, possible jobs, etc. but for the first 2 years, she will have that freedom ALL ALONE.
Also, your reference to Arias' behaviour while in Estrella will be reviewed and not go unnoticed by JSS. Her behaviour while in jail is an indication of what to expect from her once she gets to Perryville.
The fact that Arias refused a Pre-Sentencing Interview clearly shows that she continues to hide information and tries to manipulate the system. Again, this will not go unnoticed by JSS.
By delaying her sentencing for 30 days, she actually "cooked her own goose". Added to information to be used by JSS in determining the sentence are the restrictions now on Arias AND the deplorable reasons for them - such as recruiting minors to break the law.
For me, the most obvious reasons for LWOP is Arias' lack of remorse for her crime AND her vilifying Travis, the victim, in her defense.
JSS sees this too.
----------------------------------------------------------
FYI
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2012/04/12/20120412arizona-prison-clemency.html
"From 1913, when Arizona established a board of pardons and paroles, until 1993, fewer than 60 inmates a year applied for commutation, on average. In 1993, the state adopted so-called "truth in sentencing" laws, which effectively abolished parole. The new code requires offenders to serve at least 85 percent of their sentence before becoming eligible for community supervision; for many felonies, 100 percent of the sentence must be served. The laws, along with mandatory minimums that took discretion in sentencing out of the hands of judges, left commutation as the only avenue for most offenders to seek a reduced sentence..."
-------------------------------------------------------------
https://boec.az.gov/
ARIZONA BOARD OF EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY
"The Board's Mission
The mission of the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency is to ensure public safety by considering and granting parole to inmates who are certified by the Department of Corrections and who appear not to pose a threat to society and recommending to the Governor only those executive clemency actions that are in the best interests of the citizens of Arizona.
The Board’s Purpose
The Board conducts monthly parole hearings for inmates who were convicted of offenses committed on or before January 1, 1994. Hearings may also be held to consider Work Furlough, Home Arrest, Absolute Discharge from Imprisonment or from Parole Supervision: Parole Rescission; and Parole Revocation requests. The Board also conducts hearings for clemency actions that include Pardon, Commutation of Sentence and Reprieve."