02-12-2015, 03:50 PM
(02-12-2015, 01:04 PM)Observer Wrote: Thanks Lunarscope, for the comments about Travis Alexander, his journal and his blog, "Why I want to marry a gold digger." It shows Travis Alexander's character. Nowhere in these blogs or journals does he mention Jodi Arias or sex. He talks about his love for life and his goals. He is saying he wants a wife who appreciates him for "the gold" inside. We know Jodi Arias only wanted him for the sex and the BMW, the house and the dog. It was all about what he could give her. In her journal, she criticizes him and says "there is something wrong with that boy." What she is talking about is that he is talking to and spending time with other women and male friends and not focusing on her and committing to her. If you look at his text messages and emails, he says Jodi is a great girl but she is not for him and the only complaints he has against her is her stalking him and not moving on. He is moving on. His life is filled with church, friends, adventures, work. Travis was Jodi's life. She didn't care about Travis's needs, wants or dreams. She only wanted him because she thought he could give her the "freaky sex" and house, BMW and money she wanted.
Thanks Dr. KR for the 2013 video of the FBI profiler's analysis of Jodi Arias in which he calls her a master manipulator, brilliant sociopath, conman, pathological liar who uses people, has no empathy and is not very criminally sophisticated. I had not seen or heard that one. He just reinforces what I have thought all along.
It's too bad Martinez couldn't have used a criminal profiler instead of a psychologist to analyze Jodi Arias.
But for some reason, the defense is allowed to trash the victim without any evidence, but the prosecutor is limited on what he can say about the goodness of the victim and the bad traits of his murderer.
I also can't understand this weird part of the law, Observer. For instance, look at the difference between the defense's witnesses (Samuels, Lavilette, Geffner, MF) so called observations (lies) of poor little abused Arias versus the state's witness, DeMarte, who did actual psychological testings. You wouldn't think they are talking about the same person. The defense can trash Travis like he deserved to be murdered and make Arias out to be an angel who suffered untold horror. It is amazing. It is a strange thing that the law allows such lies, yet it does.