02-13-2015, 12:00 AM
Curious question for anyone.....
This jury, would they have had to have no knowledge of the first trial to qualify to sit on this jury?
It seems this trial is coming to an end sooner than later (unless the defense gets busy again).
When one looks at ALL that has been presented in the first trial, resulting in Arias' conviction, and in this trial to date, I find it hard to believe that anyone would buy into the defense's (Arias') case.
Proven......
1. Arias is a convicted murderess AND used extreme cruelty in her crime against Travis
2. Arias is a pathological liar
3. Arias knows right from wrong
4. Arias is a stalker
5. Arias is a manipulator
6. Arias goes from one relationship to another - even after murdering Travis, she was on her way to another man's place
7. Arias shows no sign of remorse
8. So-called mitigation "witnesses" were lying on their affidavits
9. BPD can be considered a mental illness but................again, she knows right from wrong
10. Defense expert witnesses not credible in their opinions
11. Travis was not a pedophile
12. Travis was not an abuser
13. Travis was not a porn fanatic
and I know there are more facts
Take everything, from the state and the defense team, as a whole as it has been presented in court and I believe that the jury would be hard pressed to find that Arias should get away with murder without suffering the punishment she deserves.
This jury, would they have had to have no knowledge of the first trial to qualify to sit on this jury?
It seems this trial is coming to an end sooner than later (unless the defense gets busy again).
When one looks at ALL that has been presented in the first trial, resulting in Arias' conviction, and in this trial to date, I find it hard to believe that anyone would buy into the defense's (Arias') case.
Proven......
1. Arias is a convicted murderess AND used extreme cruelty in her crime against Travis
2. Arias is a pathological liar
3. Arias knows right from wrong
4. Arias is a stalker
5. Arias is a manipulator
6. Arias goes from one relationship to another - even after murdering Travis, she was on her way to another man's place
7. Arias shows no sign of remorse
8. So-called mitigation "witnesses" were lying on their affidavits
9. BPD can be considered a mental illness but................again, she knows right from wrong
10. Defense expert witnesses not credible in their opinions
11. Travis was not a pedophile
12. Travis was not an abuser
13. Travis was not a porn fanatic
and I know there are more facts
Take everything, from the state and the defense team, as a whole as it has been presented in court and I believe that the jury would be hard pressed to find that Arias should get away with murder without suffering the punishment she deserves.