(02-24-2015, 06:10 PM)Lunarscope Wrote:(02-24-2015, 05:50 PM)NERN Wrote:(02-24-2015, 05:39 PM)Lunarscope Wrote: Thanks Nern' evident by backstabbing wounds' and however first wound was assaulted it was alike a backstab, plus nude defenseless and 3 times overkill! The normalcy appearance has Jodi a Worst of the Worst, she Charms to Slaughter!
I also think Travis was so respected and financially secure Jodi loved the stuff = what money buys and popularity avails more actually instead of Travis in relationship to normal love with devotion!
Arias is incapable of truly loving anyone. Her overwhelming desire to have all the trappings of the material world that she feels she deserves definitely overrides any love, compassion, empathy or humanity with regard to other people.
Thanks that's exactly my perception' rephrased concisely with elegance!
Glad that we are in agreement Lunarscope! Makes one feel they may be on the right track.
In reading everything so far that Nurmi has been saying, I see it as just a rehash of the defense's case.
Things that have all been said before.
He continually refers to Arias as "girl" and "mentally ill". As he did not put on any mitigation case, he now must align his closing to address the mitigating factors.
Too little, too late.
He is even proclaiming that Travis was responsible for the "not" porn on the Bishops' computer when it has been emphatically proven otherwise.
He is bringing in the porn once again.
IMO opinion, there is nothing that he is saying that proves Arias should not get the DP.
They are saying that the jury is listening and watching Nurmi as he speaks.
OF COURSE THEY ARE!
That is what they must do and I do not see the relevance in what they are saying.
I have had enough of Nurmi and his bogus defense and now his bogus closing. So sick of him and this entire defense.
I await Mr. Martinez.