03-03-2015, 10:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-03-2015, 10:25 PM by Lunarscope.)
Mostly silent over there just a comment by Hockey Nana and to me she is confused about DP being a retrial and Life for Jodi being better for the Alexander family - she makes good comments but gets these issues reversed in my minds eye,
I'll say if they had been voting secret, judge said to open debate, I'm unsure about the 2 questions, but 'No more notes to judge' (undecided related) or it will hang again, they get one plea for help!
I still say DP and that must be the majority' so we can only assume one juror wants life with any certainty' more is just a possible, it doesn't look favorable for a DP but we know nothing!
Judge didn't even know her jury were out to lunch when she said to bring them into the courtroom, and for just 5 minutes of formal court that's unprofessional to me!
I still ponder if jury asked of any possibility for 25, its central to deliberations and I don't believe JSS has a answer' that as a juror, that I would accept, I was hopeing jury went on strike' due to that unanswered question, myself, that is "IF" it was asked!
Nurmi gets a high dollar career with life and a DP sentence puts him back to being a Public defender' so of-course he asked for mis-trial!
People don't understand jury can say DP Â but if they say life the Judge can say 25 years' years later in appellate court, JSS is Jodis Judge forever!
2 secret jury questions makes my wonder why inform then withhold, instead of doing like the 4 prior questions' = just don't tell the world questions were asked and answered?
Edit-in I see the taking breaks timing as aggravation' from arguing without progression, its just the timing that I'm scrutinizing and I was wrong about a verdict this morning' so I could be wrong about timing of breaks also!
I'll say if they had been voting secret, judge said to open debate, I'm unsure about the 2 questions, but 'No more notes to judge' (undecided related) or it will hang again, they get one plea for help!
I still say DP and that must be the majority' so we can only assume one juror wants life with any certainty' more is just a possible, it doesn't look favorable for a DP but we know nothing!
Judge didn't even know her jury were out to lunch when she said to bring them into the courtroom, and for just 5 minutes of formal court that's unprofessional to me!
I still ponder if jury asked of any possibility for 25, its central to deliberations and I don't believe JSS has a answer' that as a juror, that I would accept, I was hopeing jury went on strike' due to that unanswered question, myself, that is "IF" it was asked!
Nurmi gets a high dollar career with life and a DP sentence puts him back to being a Public defender' so of-course he asked for mis-trial!
People don't understand jury can say DP Â but if they say life the Judge can say 25 years' years later in appellate court, JSS is Jodis Judge forever!
2 secret jury questions makes my wonder why inform then withhold, instead of doing like the 4 prior questions' = just don't tell the world questions were asked and answered?
Edit-in I see the taking breaks timing as aggravation' from arguing without progression, its just the timing that I'm scrutinizing and I was wrong about a verdict this morning' so I could be wrong about timing of breaks also!