Juan Martinez Prosecutor Support Page shared Kevin Samantha's post.
4 hrs ·
by Kevin Samantha‎
I know that many, many people are angry yet I hope you take some solace in the fact that JAA will never get out of, and will spend her entire natural life in prison. As well, whoever got their mittens on the names of all the jurors, may well be facing criminal prosecution. The names had to have come from the court records as their middle names were released. We know it wasn't Juan Martinez, it wasn't JSS, it wasn't the Bailiff, which leaves only 3 other plausible parties. Maria DeLaRosa, Kirk Nurmi or Jennifer Willmott and if I were betting on this, I'd put my 5 cents on MDLR. Either way, the release of those names is a federal offense. I hope they have enough monopoly money to hire a darn good, and very expensive, attorney as whoever did this is in boiling hot water. As well, Juror 17 did disclose her husband (s) served time but when asked if she knew any of the counsel or court staff, she replied "no". The word for that is perjury.
.
Here's the link to Court Chatter where Cathy Russon states that the anti death penalty speech may not have been given by Juror No. 17 and she shows the court document pertaining to Juror No. 7's ex husband with Juan Martinez's name on it. Juan was the prosecutor on that case where he received probation. She can say she forgot or deny she ever knew the name of the prosecutor since it happened in 2000 and her ex got probation on that case but was later prosecuted on another crime by another prosecutor. If this woman truly got on the jury to hang it, she is a criminal and criminals know how to lie to get away with their crimes. I think it is most likely that this woman was one of those who followed the case and believe Jodi Arias was abused by Travis Alexander and she wanted to make sure she got on the jury so she could hang it. Even before deliberating when the jurors voted 6-6 for death, she told the jurors to call the bailiff and said they were hung. Most of the jurors had never even been in a courtroom and didn't even know what a hung jury meant but they knew the law dictated they had to have an open mind and look at the evidence and see if they would change their mind. She only wanted to look at the journals which to her showed Arias was a nice normal girl and she wouldn't even consider changing her mind. The others had open minds and were willing to change their minds based on the evidence and testimony they went over. She wouldn't even consider it.
http://www.courtchatter.com/
4 hrs ·
by Kevin Samantha‎
I know that many, many people are angry yet I hope you take some solace in the fact that JAA will never get out of, and will spend her entire natural life in prison. As well, whoever got their mittens on the names of all the jurors, may well be facing criminal prosecution. The names had to have come from the court records as their middle names were released. We know it wasn't Juan Martinez, it wasn't JSS, it wasn't the Bailiff, which leaves only 3 other plausible parties. Maria DeLaRosa, Kirk Nurmi or Jennifer Willmott and if I were betting on this, I'd put my 5 cents on MDLR. Either way, the release of those names is a federal offense. I hope they have enough monopoly money to hire a darn good, and very expensive, attorney as whoever did this is in boiling hot water. As well, Juror 17 did disclose her husband (s) served time but when asked if she knew any of the counsel or court staff, she replied "no". The word for that is perjury.
.
Here's the link to Court Chatter where Cathy Russon states that the anti death penalty speech may not have been given by Juror No. 17 and she shows the court document pertaining to Juror No. 7's ex husband with Juan Martinez's name on it. Juan was the prosecutor on that case where he received probation. She can say she forgot or deny she ever knew the name of the prosecutor since it happened in 2000 and her ex got probation on that case but was later prosecuted on another crime by another prosecutor. If this woman truly got on the jury to hang it, she is a criminal and criminals know how to lie to get away with their crimes. I think it is most likely that this woman was one of those who followed the case and believe Jodi Arias was abused by Travis Alexander and she wanted to make sure she got on the jury so she could hang it. Even before deliberating when the jurors voted 6-6 for death, she told the jurors to call the bailiff and said they were hung. Most of the jurors had never even been in a courtroom and didn't even know what a hung jury meant but they knew the law dictated they had to have an open mind and look at the evidence and see if they would change their mind. She only wanted to look at the journals which to her showed Arias was a nice normal girl and she wouldn't even consider changing her mind. The others had open minds and were willing to change their minds based on the evidence and testimony they went over. She wouldn't even consider it.
http://www.courtchatter.com/