Observer - you are absolutely correct in disagreeing with me about HLN. Again, it was another mistake on my part. I meant PRO PROSECUTION and typed pro Arias by mistake. Apparently I am not doing well - my mind is ahead of my typing.
HLN had her guilty right from the start and that is bias news reporting in my books.
With regard to juror misconduct, please enlighten me where Juror #17 said she was against the DP when being interviewed as a prospective juror. If she did say that, of course she would be disqualified to sit on the jury.
If, while in deliberations, she felt the DP was not warranted in this case after reviewing the evidence, so be it.
No one knows for sure where she stood as she sat on the jury. Too many are speculating that she had to have come in against the DP to have voted the way she did. I still believe that she was entitled to her opinion during deliberations and apparently the court and the attorneys did too. I may not like her position at all but she is entitled to it.
HLN had her guilty right from the start and that is bias news reporting in my books.
With regard to juror misconduct, please enlighten me where Juror #17 said she was against the DP when being interviewed as a prospective juror. If she did say that, of course she would be disqualified to sit on the jury.
If, while in deliberations, she felt the DP was not warranted in this case after reviewing the evidence, so be it.
No one knows for sure where she stood as she sat on the jury. Too many are speculating that she had to have come in against the DP to have voted the way she did. I still believe that she was entitled to her opinion during deliberations and apparently the court and the attorneys did too. I may not like her position at all but she is entitled to it.