03-18-2015, 04:33 PM
Lunarscope,
The link you provided is exactly the same as the one I posted REGARDING q AND a WITH tROY hAYDEN.
I AM VERY SCEPTICAL OF ANY REPORTER!
But I have to say that as I posted, I felt that this interview was quite good.
Hayden is very careful to not make any statement that he has not had confirmed to him. He was quite upfront that NO evidence of crimes or wrongdoing have been identified to date with regard to jury tampering or the money trail.
As far as fueling the public opinion, if he could not answer questions definitively and with proof, he said so.
Yes, he has an opinion on the fact that Arias got Life and not the DP but he spoke of the "worst of the worst" being anyone who murders a child, a defenseless child. I have to agree with that. In an earlier interview he also included police officers.
He did not ignore Martinez with regard to juror #17. He talked about Martinez' motion to have her dismissed (which was denied). He also spoke about the fact that more research should have been done after juror #17 stated she had and is married to two men who are convicted felons.
I have always felt that, in the best interest of the Alexander family and their ability to move forward in their lives, life was a clear option. No years and years of appeals and having to attend court and face Arias. I also have felt that a DP verdict could be commuted to life and/or the DP could be abolished long before it is carried out. Just my opinion.
I DO have to say, that because of the horrendous nature of Arias' crime, because the Alexander family wanted the DP and that it is the current law in Arizona and Arias qualified, I supported the DP in this case.
And yes, your second link posted did not work.
The link you provided is exactly the same as the one I posted REGARDING q AND a WITH tROY hAYDEN.
I AM VERY SCEPTICAL OF ANY REPORTER!
But I have to say that as I posted, I felt that this interview was quite good.
Hayden is very careful to not make any statement that he has not had confirmed to him. He was quite upfront that NO evidence of crimes or wrongdoing have been identified to date with regard to jury tampering or the money trail.
As far as fueling the public opinion, if he could not answer questions definitively and with proof, he said so.
Yes, he has an opinion on the fact that Arias got Life and not the DP but he spoke of the "worst of the worst" being anyone who murders a child, a defenseless child. I have to agree with that. In an earlier interview he also included police officers.
He did not ignore Martinez with regard to juror #17. He talked about Martinez' motion to have her dismissed (which was denied). He also spoke about the fact that more research should have been done after juror #17 stated she had and is married to two men who are convicted felons.
I have always felt that, in the best interest of the Alexander family and their ability to move forward in their lives, life was a clear option. No years and years of appeals and having to attend court and face Arias. I also have felt that a DP verdict could be commuted to life and/or the DP could be abolished long before it is carried out. Just my opinion.
I DO have to say, that because of the horrendous nature of Arias' crime, because the Alexander family wanted the DP and that it is the current law in Arizona and Arias qualified, I supported the DP in this case.
And yes, your second link posted did not work.