03-18-2015, 07:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-18-2015, 07:18 PM by Lunarscope.)
Edit-in thanks Nerm and I want the same' your post came while I was writing and I posted before reading, we all just want what's best and I'm still anticipating the law to rear its claws, I'm worried their going to miss some things' and their are so many things going on in the 7 years' ignored, just going by what I just posted in the last few days' word is out and Arizona must respond, that Simon = SJ has made Millions by scamming without ever having a thing to sell (aside his books) Americans alone have given him their hard earned money for not for 25 years, and he just refuses to stop, while the law didn't want to contend with his high dollar legal team, again paid for absent any product' beyond scamming!
I had arguments to this all ready (each paragraph) for posting' but zapped away, (I'll get to it later) yes we just wait!
Jodi will be broke and lose 1/2 of her pay for cleaning toilets' but she will (like Troy said) make friends, because she molds into personalities (if she survives' that is), Jodi is allowed $80.00 a month and if her friends give her money (like OJ) it would take $160.00 a month for Jodi to get her $80.00 to spend, let's just assume Jodi gets nothing' and she will have nothing, her parents will have nothing, she is called a 'Ward of the Courts' and lives on what broke convicts live on, the Alexander family with Attorney getting 40%' only need a value of a retainer' the guy with her artwork has $4.100.00, so the Alexander family lose no retainer costs' pre-paid legal was Travis and Hughes' the PPL is not involved but theirs Attorneys wanting free money for the cost of filing paperwork,
Juan Martinez Prosecutor Support Page 12 hrs ago
Some were confused about a docket entry today. The State did not file any Motions today. That docket entry today was only indicating the Defenses Motion for Mistrial on March 4th.....
@ Martinez filed a motion, then filed a motion with proof on the next day, now we have new submitted' the composer of article is confused, their are 2 options, motion is moot or motion is held!
State filed a Motion to strike Juror 17 on March 3, alleging that she had viewed the movie “The Secret” and researched “The Law of Attraction World” recently, according to activity on her Facebook page.
Juror 17 said she had not “read, seen or heard anything about the case in the media,” according to documents. She said she had read “The Secret” and seen the movie two years before the trial started.
@ So what is it #17's word or the State?
The State filed a second motion to strike Juror 17 the following day, accusing her of accessing her Facebook page and “liking” various local and national media outlets. The State argued that Juror 17 could have seen local media coverage of the trial on her newsfeed, said court documents. However, the Court said all jurors had the opportunity to do that, and no misconduct was found on the part of Juror 17.
@ Now we find the State had Proof and the Court found No Proof! Note one of her news feeds didn't exist' web page exist until midtrial, Nancy Grace was also on her favorite list' watched during trial.
On March 4th, the defense then filed a motion for mistrial, citing juror coercion regarding the individual questioning of the jurors. That motion was denied.
@ Motion denied is not motion eliminated in a court of law, it's up to Martinez to forget or if warrented table!
I want the jury system to work, this juror had married the day before her first husband (drive-by shooting' death resulting) got his light prison term, later busted again = divorced, her second husband also has been in prison.
So what can be the avenues of research, Mob, Mafia, Drugs, I wait' but I see no less than collusion' to hang a jury and ponder if their was a third party payoff or favor, cause their is #17 guilty of assured Juror misconduct' nevertheless, gossip is notwithstanding!
Because she friended a news web page that didn't exist pre-trial, plus court officials and defense attorney under fire for investigation!
I had arguments to this all ready (each paragraph) for posting' but zapped away, (I'll get to it later) yes we just wait!
Jodi will be broke and lose 1/2 of her pay for cleaning toilets' but she will (like Troy said) make friends, because she molds into personalities (if she survives' that is), Jodi is allowed $80.00 a month and if her friends give her money (like OJ) it would take $160.00 a month for Jodi to get her $80.00 to spend, let's just assume Jodi gets nothing' and she will have nothing, her parents will have nothing, she is called a 'Ward of the Courts' and lives on what broke convicts live on, the Alexander family with Attorney getting 40%' only need a value of a retainer' the guy with her artwork has $4.100.00, so the Alexander family lose no retainer costs' pre-paid legal was Travis and Hughes' the PPL is not involved but theirs Attorneys wanting free money for the cost of filing paperwork,
Juan Martinez Prosecutor Support Page 12 hrs ago
Some were confused about a docket entry today. The State did not file any Motions today. That docket entry today was only indicating the Defenses Motion for Mistrial on March 4th.....
@ Martinez filed a motion, then filed a motion with proof on the next day, now we have new submitted' the composer of article is confused, their are 2 options, motion is moot or motion is held!
State filed a Motion to strike Juror 17 on March 3, alleging that she had viewed the movie “The Secret” and researched “The Law of Attraction World” recently, according to activity on her Facebook page.
Juror 17 said she had not “read, seen or heard anything about the case in the media,” according to documents. She said she had read “The Secret” and seen the movie two years before the trial started.
@ So what is it #17's word or the State?
The State filed a second motion to strike Juror 17 the following day, accusing her of accessing her Facebook page and “liking” various local and national media outlets. The State argued that Juror 17 could have seen local media coverage of the trial on her newsfeed, said court documents. However, the Court said all jurors had the opportunity to do that, and no misconduct was found on the part of Juror 17.
@ Now we find the State had Proof and the Court found No Proof! Note one of her news feeds didn't exist' web page exist until midtrial, Nancy Grace was also on her favorite list' watched during trial.
On March 4th, the defense then filed a motion for mistrial, citing juror coercion regarding the individual questioning of the jurors. That motion was denied.
@ Motion denied is not motion eliminated in a court of law, it's up to Martinez to forget or if warrented table!
I want the jury system to work, this juror had married the day before her first husband (drive-by shooting' death resulting) got his light prison term, later busted again = divorced, her second husband also has been in prison.
So what can be the avenues of research, Mob, Mafia, Drugs, I wait' but I see no less than collusion' to hang a jury and ponder if their was a third party payoff or favor, cause their is #17 guilty of assured Juror misconduct' nevertheless, gossip is notwithstanding!
Because she friended a news web page that didn't exist pre-trial, plus court officials and defense attorney under fire for investigation!