03-18-2015, 08:48 PM
I've been thinking about some things. Things that don't make much sense to me.
1- We've heard a lot out of the defense team about 'threats'...threats to their 'star' witness, which turned out to be ... Arias. No proof offered about how she could have death threats while being guarded in the jail.
2- Threats that made it 'impossible' for 13 of her witnesses to testify. Again, no proof of any kind.
3- Threats to Nurmi and Wilmott. Again, no proof was given.
4- Threats against the 'hold out' witness, but again...no proofs presented.
Meanwhile, Juan presented 'proof' that she had been viewing news sites and Nancy Grace, but this gets a slap down by the Judge. As if it would be improper for her to wait that 2 weeks for her decision.
I expect that next, MDLR will be screaming she's getting 'threats', even tho' from what I understand, her accounts were all private.
Then, what is it about the number 14 concerning the defense team?
They claimed they had 14 witness who would testify IF they could testify in private.
Even after presenting 4 witnesses...Arias, 'fake name, fake computer expert 'Smith', Fonseco and Geffner....they STILL claimed to have 14 witnesses anxious to testify, if they could do so in secret. I must have forgotten how to subtract. I would think there would still be 10, not still 14 of them.
Now, we've heard there are 14 banks involved in hiding donations and money in the latest smoke screen. What's up with the number 14?
1- We've heard a lot out of the defense team about 'threats'...threats to their 'star' witness, which turned out to be ... Arias. No proof offered about how she could have death threats while being guarded in the jail.
2- Threats that made it 'impossible' for 13 of her witnesses to testify. Again, no proof of any kind.
3- Threats to Nurmi and Wilmott. Again, no proof was given.
4- Threats against the 'hold out' witness, but again...no proofs presented.
Meanwhile, Juan presented 'proof' that she had been viewing news sites and Nancy Grace, but this gets a slap down by the Judge. As if it would be improper for her to wait that 2 weeks for her decision.
I expect that next, MDLR will be screaming she's getting 'threats', even tho' from what I understand, her accounts were all private.
Then, what is it about the number 14 concerning the defense team?
They claimed they had 14 witness who would testify IF they could testify in private.
Even after presenting 4 witnesses...Arias, 'fake name, fake computer expert 'Smith', Fonseco and Geffner....they STILL claimed to have 14 witnesses anxious to testify, if they could do so in secret. I must have forgotten how to subtract. I would think there would still be 10, not still 14 of them.
Now, we've heard there are 14 banks involved in hiding donations and money in the latest smoke screen. What's up with the number 14?