End is Near Hopefully

[Lunarscope]

I believe the complicity is evident and has been reported' so yes authorities will deal with the Arias family, Aunt and all. I have continually read of authorities being made aware of suspected financial improprieties, over a year Dox is who I follow and Chris Hughes a lot and today Dox posted the DUI boyfriend = was calling himself Arias, was not only getting Jodi notes passed to him by MDLR in the courtroom, that he also is still active in financing the Arias family, he was her art dealer, some signed fake art was told about from another source, unconfirmed.

The reporters who blog agree not one report of Jodi money has ever been found by IRS being taxed, easy proof for reporters to inquire, Note I posted back a bit, the Christina blog about MDLR was removed by the inquirer news, Christina hasn't explained and Juanstie hasn't been around, So parts of that story was quelched for reason, I believe it was full of facts' just cannot rely of which.

---

Heres the entire conversation!FYI - Ben Ernst AKA @Quinn__Michaels
JA BF ---#JODIARIAS ARRESTED FOR DWI ETC he still funds ja n her family
4:35 AM - 5 May 2015
6 FAVORITES

Reply to @DoxingRx
Replies

7h7 hours ago
WideOpen ‏@corruptfux
@DoxingRx @Quinn__Michaels Still? Lol...what a dumbass

7h7 hours ago
jackie blue ‏@GarrisonBlue
@patricia_iffrig He is or was in charge of the art sales. Not sure where he stands with them since arrest. @DoxingRx @Quinn__Michaels

6h6 hours ago
jackie blue ‏@GarrisonBlue
@patricia_iffrig @DoxingRx @Quinn__Michaels I don't know but I don't think so.

6h6 hours ago
jackie blue ‏@GarrisonBlue
@patricia_iffrig @DoxingRx @Quinn__Michaels I think you're right. He seemed to be chummy with sj.

6h6 hours ago
jackie blue ‏@GarrisonBlue
@patricia_iffrig @DoxingRx @Quinn__Michaels I've got to go rest a little more. Have a great morning Ladies

6h6 hours ago
Carla Leichtenberger ‏@KarlaMNL
@patricia_iffrig @DoxingRx @Quinn__Michaels Ben Ernst= Conman, Pathetic Loser 281129s Love connection & NOT going to get to C Her in Prison

6h6 hours ago
Carla Leichtenberger ‏@KarlaMNL
@patricia_iffrig @DoxingRx @Quinn__Michaels bahahahahahaha

6h6 hours ago
Carla Leichtenberger ‏@KarlaMNL
@patricia_iffrig @DoxingRx @Quinn__Michael murderer passing love notes to cha cha in court yo give 2 her loser Real Proffesional Slutalicous

---

I have read where the Arias Bankruptcy Trustees office has been informed of a list of financial suspicions, and that the Arizona IRS, DOJ offices have been separately informed of Jodi money, I think the 2 for 1 artwork sales were just getting what was available because the trial was winding down, they were Prints or copies, the originals were selling for $1,500.00 to $3,000.00 and one for $5,000.00, Jodi was tracing 2 a week, and I think the pinwheel and more were not Jodis' just signed by Jodi.

If $55,000.00 exist (Jodis mother claim) and gets matching $50,000.00, that's only what's openly reported, many were sending monthly, all Jodi supporters are distorted and hateful' but that doesn't mean Broke. JII is run by Simon who knows false claims against Travis and the Alexander family stirs aggression' then he Demands contributions, their are various entities requesting money for Jodi worldwide' it's nieve to ignore.

I actually voiced not to condemn Jodis parents upto the day Jodi was sentenced, I stand corrected, her parents deserve the laws punishment to the fullest extent, Aunt Sue deserves jail-time.

[Lunarscope]

What Makes Jodi Arias Tick?

By Mark Olshaker On May 23, 2013

After my post earlier this week comparing the trials of Amanda Knox, Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias, one of our readers and friends, writer Carolyn Quinn, asked if we could provide a full assessment of Ms. Arias, who is currently awaiting an Arizona jury’s verdict on whether she should be executed or imprisoned for life for the brutal murder of her former lover Travis Alexander.

While it is risky to attempt a full psychological assessment of anyone from afar, there are several things we can say with reasonable certainty based on her established behavior.


Let’s take the broad definition first. Arias is what we have long referred to as a sociopath, or sometimes a psychopath. DSM-IV, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, replaced the term for this condition with “anti-social personality disorder,” though we think that sounds a bit mild for what it represents.

Whatever you call it, it is characterized by “a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood.” Sociopathy should not be confused with psychosis, which implies some degree of loss of contact with reality.

To complicate things a bit further, Arias can also be described by another DSM term: “borderline personality,” so called because it is thought to be on the borderline between neurosis and psychosis. This makes sense when we consider that all mental disorders run somewhere along a continuum. For example, someone who is always alert for people out to get him may have few or no other misperceptions of reality, whereas a paranoid schizophrenic may hallucinate and hear voices and very definitely qualify as a full-fledged psychotic.

Someone like Arias, on the other hand, certainly understands reality, and more to the point, understands the distinction between right and wrong. She just doesn’t care. This is what we often call a “character disorder.”

So what does all of this actually mean? Well, the easiest way to summarize what is admittedly a fairly complex subject, is to enumerate some of the characteristics we would expect to see.

The first is narcissism. Again, this trait will lie along a continuum, but in extreme instances like this one, it manifests as a total involvement with self to the exclusion of consideration for others. This goes hand-in-hand with a total disregard for the truth. For these types, truth is a commodity rather than an absolute; that is, it is a tool to achieve an end. And if that end is better served with a lie, that is a completely acceptable “moral” choice.

That is why it was so easy for Arias to go from a total lie about even being at the murder scene to eventually conceding she had committed the murder when confronted with overwhelming evidence. But even then, she had to lie about motive, saying it was self-defense after Alexander abused her. She had to change her story yet again to cover the fact that she had shot him in the head and stabbed him many times while he was defenseless in the shower.

Even during her extensive trial testimony, she was in a continual mode of having to say essentially, “I know I lied in the past, but I’m telling the truth now,” updating this statement as necessary.

I put “moral” in quotes in an earlier paragraph because that leads to the second characteristic, which is that there is no morality for this individual other than what is best for her. Other people have no rights.

A third characteristic is actually a modus operandi, and that is manipulation. These people are very good at manipulating those around them to achieve their own ends. It is therefore wholly understandable that Arias decided to take the stand in her own defense. Based on her previous experiences, she probably had perfect confidence in her ability to manipulate the prosecutor and jury to her own ends. Then, in the sentencing phase, she was able to jump smoothly from announcing to the media that she wanted to die, only to beg the jury to spare her life a few days later.

And a fourth – a perfect fit with what has preceded – is a projection onto others for all of their own faults and flaws. She killed Travis because of what he was doing to her, not Jodi’s own rage over being dumped. She wanted to be spared the death penalty not for herself, but because of what it would do to her family. She further played on the jury’s sympathy by enumerating all of the things she wouldn’t be able to do now, like get married, have a baby or even attend her sister’s wedding, as if it was the jury’s fault and its members therefore had to “make it up to her” by sparing her life.

So, finally, is Jodi Arias sorry? You bet she is. She’s sorry she got caught and blamed and that this is going to mess up the rest of her life. Because in the world of Jodi Arias and her like, that is all that matters.


geebee2 says: August 2, 2013
Longwinded nonsense delegated!


Merle Rideout says: July 26, 2013

You make interesting points, Mark. A social worker friend of mine has a different take on neurotic/psychotic/borderline/sociopath divisions.

She says a neurotic is versed in reality but responds to real circumstances inappropriately, obsessive-compulsive disorder an extreme example.

A psychotic is delusional. Much of his behavior is based in a completely incorrect perception of people and events many of which may not exist.

The borderline personality is one that behaves impulsively with motives very hard for people unfamiliar with their specific histories to understand.

A sociopath has no delusions but neither has he any conscience and feels no empathy toward others.

My friend’s belief is that all of these problems are a result of experiences that happened to the sufferers at some time in their lives. She does not think a tumor or an injury can cause these problem but she concedes that a tumor or an injury can make a problem that already exist worse.

@ Although thoroughly explained by author and in the comment, the acting chameleon was omitted.
I believer some of every default above can be found in Jodi, I just stick with demented.

Also infantile brain damage or brain birth defect are both omitted, whereas I agree with progression' I believe Jodi has brain stem issues, she is miswired.

-------------------------------------------------------------

2 Cassandra replies' unedited below, I take these paragraphs starting from her as a source.
Jodi claiming RULE 11 is saying mentally incompetent, and reasoned her first Two Attorneys to both quit and have the public defender office quit Jodi.
Court Minutes reveal Jodi was wanting IQ tested in timeframe just before forged letters.
Private practice Nurmi' joined the public defenders office to represent Jodi, then the Forged letters had Willmott third chair and Victoria Washington's conflict with MM = released, and Nurmi asked for double compensation wanting to quit.
Under Federal mandate JSS has 3 days from this Monday to assign Jodi representation, she also has Willmott working until June first' So Jodi retains assigned council.
All said because' if PD office again refuses to represent Jodi' JSS must assign a expsnsive private practice appellate attorney, I believe Public Defender office is again refusing to represent Jodi.
A appeal or paper appeal is most often done by filings, seldom needing a courtroom' if a courtroom is used it's called "In Camera"!
Motion to JSS and Martinez, Martinez replies to JSS, Jodi and appellate defense team, then Jodi team rebuttal, JSS uses a memorandum decision.
JSS cannot favor any issue before petitioning Arizona Appeals court 3 judge panel' so 4 judges must agree, the PCR appeal denial can only advance to 5 Judge Arizona Supreme Court then it is exhausted, USSC use requires all State appeals to be exausted. 3 out of 4 appeals are denied, even if accepted' fewer help and fewer yet require a In Camera hearing' a retrial would require Ninjas recreation into persons. Jodi has next to O chance of her appeal working but she has a extreme possibility of costing Arizona another 1/4 million for this one appeal, appeals are called 'real law' because courtroom is rarely used = Paper Appeal, accordingly appellate attorneys are of higher learning and charge more hourly' explaining higher retainers' example
Frederica Strumpff or the Jodi appelate attorney team that was posted on JMSP.
Note Casandra shared a cell with Jodi pretrial, I posted her entirely so as to respect' by not editing, I think she very mu h cushions her postings.


Casandra Collins

When Jodi Ann Arias was "Representing Herself" for a brief time in 2014 ~ Jodi Ann Arias was trying to manipulate and deceive Judge Sherry Stephens to order a Rule 11 Examination. Obviously, Judge Sherry Stephens NEVER fell for any of "The Stunts pulled by Jodi Ann Arias" in The Superior Court of Maricopa County! Even back then, Jodi Ann Arias wanted Her Attorneys to be Officially Removed as Counsel, and be assigned to The Maricopa County Public Defender's Office to have Defense Attorney Federica Strumpff assigned to Her Case! Jodi Ann Arias is Extremely Manipulative, Extremely Calculative, Extremely Deceitful, and Extremely Intelligent! Criminal Defense Attorney Frederica Strumpff is (1) of The Leading Criminal Defense Attorneys in The State of Arizona & in This Nation that is an EXPERT IN MENTAL HEALTH LAWS! Criminal Defense Attorney at Law Federica Strumpff only embarasses other attorneys or puts to shame other attorneys; such as, Willmott & Nurmi! I feel deeply sorry for The Alexander Family! Justice & Victory for Mr. Travis Alexander! Justice & Victory for The Alexander Family!

Casandra Collins

Jodi Ann Arias always wanted Maricopa County Public Defender - Defense Attorney Frederica Strumpff to be on Her Criminal Case! Criminal Defense Attorney Frederica Strumpff is (1) of The Leading Criminal Defense Attorneys in The State of Arizona & in This Nation that is an EXPERT IN MENTAL HEALTH LAWS! Looks Like! Jodi Ann Arias got "Her Wish!" I feel deeply sorry for The Alexander Family!!! Justice & Victory for Mr. Travis Alexander! Justice & Victory for The Alexander Family!

[Lavender]

http://justiceandretribution.wordpress.com/2015/05/06/appeals-process-the-alexanders-wrongful-death-suit/
Great information

[Lunarscope]

Hi Lavender' I found the article very interesting' but also full of misinformation, a federal writ of habeas corpus, (most often aims for USSC relief) Can not be filed before all Arizona appeals are exhausted. Jodi filed a PCR not a Direct appeal, PCR goes to JSS then if JSS finds a error in law' JSS must word her own motion to Appeals Courts 3 judge panel, the 3 judge appellate court tells in a memorandum JSS how to respond, if JSS just denies the entire appeal then Jodi loses, Jodi can resubmit appeal denial to the Arizona Supreme Court' that's very costly and takes years, if again denied that appeal is exhausted.
I have Not heard the names of Jodi appointed Attorneys' JSS asked the Private Defender Office for attorney, we are talking from the April 13th hearing, not attornies that claimed to represent Jodi weeks ago, they are not confirmed by the courts. The Public Defender Office quit Jodi pretrial and that was before the Forged letters, when Nurmi was chaired. JSS put in minutes that she saw no conflict of interest' I think the Public Defender will and has seen a reason Not to represent Jodi, because JSS had 3 days to publish new attorney or attorneys' that's today or early tomorrow, I expect Jodi will get a Private Appellate Attorney again, but also expect swift appeal denial.
A appeal to JSS and Martinez gets Martinez reply and a defense team reply all paper motions, then JSS memorandum decision, nothing about Jodi arguments are allowed' just Judicial decision mistakes or State / Martinez errors' Jodi can also blame MDLR in appeal but nothing about the crime or evidence is allowed, appeals only relate to errors or intentional errors.
---------------------------------------
A Direct appeal can also be filed and if so the PCR becomes a Rider appeal = PCR is asking for relief, that relief relates to winning the Direct appeal, If Jodi files a Direct Appeal it is to the 5 Judge Arizona Supreme Court' if denied that appeal is exhausted.

Most appeals argue the best 3 or so arguments' their is a limitation to how many words are allowed.
Jodi and everyone can appeal forever' but cannot stop appealing or all appeals become exhausted, courts can read and dismiss appeals or let the steps I explained above to be used, the courts use deadlines to file appeals to avoid future frivolous appealing.

---------------------------------------------------------

On this I am unsure' I hope the Jodi appeal submitted then shown to Martinez and dismissed as frivolous instantaneously, without Martinez reply or defense team rebuttal, if that's both posable and happens, Jodi appealing will be exhausted and yesterdays news in a few months.

[Lunarscope]

Alice Munce post and my understanding combined.
I'm @ & Alice is ®!

® From AZ rules of criminal procedure: " Ineffective assistance of counsel claims:
All ineffective assistance of counsel claims MUST be raised in petitions for post-conviction relief.

Any such claims raised by direct appeal will NOT be addressed by appellate courts regardless of merit.

See State v. Spreitz, 202 Ariz. 1, 39 P.3d 525 (2002).

@ So Alice is saying Direct appeal issue and PCR issues do not intermingle, agreeing' with confusion rewording.

Their are 3 Courts available to Jodi = JSS trial court, 3 judge appeal court and 5 judge Arizona Supreme court, later district court and USSC.

PCR is Not Arizona appellate court directly' unless JSS finds fault, if fault is found JSS must ask Appellate Court for recommendation ruling, trial court cannot 'Case Law' only Arizona Supreme court thru Arizona appellate court ruling, could then use JSS to overrule any trial fault.

Relief means just that' a reduction of sentence for cause relating to Direct Appeal overruling.

Most often PCR filings follow Direct Appeal over-rulings' or when overruling is assumed assured, telling us the early PCR is because JSS is convinced Jodi has arguments of Nurmi issues, actually Jodi with early PCR tables more arguments' because Direct Appeal only permits limited words.

Nurmi not liking Jodi and slouching during the first trial, and Martinez intentionally dropping the camera type of arguments are PCR appealable not Direct Appeal issues.
Being charged for Murder with the Death Penalty argument is Direct appeal' including things like, JSS rulings against admitting forged letters, even allowing Jodi secret testimony released and Martinez allowed to view Jodi visitation records = that was before JSS by Judge Duncan and higher Arizona courts overruled.

Remember appeal words are limited' only 3 issues normally.

® “Where ineffective assistance of counsel claims are raised, or could have been raised, in a Rule 32 post-conviction relief proceeding, subsequent claims of ineffective assistance will be deemed waived and precluded.” Id., citing State v. Conner, 163 Ariz. 97, 100, 786 P.2d 948, 951 (1990)."

So ineffective counsel won't be considered by the direct appeal court.

Failure to do what JSS did, would be potential judicial error later on. It also will force the PD office to deal with this immediately. Looks like she wants the issue raised early, maybe before the DA.

@ Alice tells 1 year of paralegal' and is learning' I finally agree with what she tells here.
But' the PCR is ineffective council issues' and certain ineffective council issues can be also Direct Appeal issues, Direct appeal would only be Nurmi procedure, MDLR procedure, Martinez procedure, Florez procedure and JSS or higher court procedures!

So in essence Jodis mother was correct' Jodi has Two free appeals, PCR and Direct, JSS has filed for Jodi a PCR appeal, (earlier than is normally) and a direct appeal would = normally a-front the Post Conviction 'RELIEF' of reason to reduce sentence.
Jodi will argue the DP tabled equated overcharging to jury instructions' in direct appeal and that Nurmi informed Jury of many facts and lots of possibilities (= shot Travis sitting in shower, retrial opening statement) that aided the Prosecution.

Dan Ryack claimed weeks ago that he was Jodis appeals attorney. (We have seen no filings or conformation from the courts), he would be used for direct appeal then PCR if case won, PCR's early public defender office involvement would be a conflict of multiple attorneys. So Dan Ryack must wait to file anything beyond intent to file a Direct Appeal and that depends on Jodi money Not being exposed at July first restitution hearing.
A Free Public Defender Direct Appeal remains optional until after restitution hearing when time to appeal expires. PCR to JSS appeal could be put on the back-burner to Direct Appeal results, or to Dan Ryack retainer representation, I myself believe Public Defender office will again inform JSS refusal to handle Jodi and if so Jodi will want Dan Ryack as court appointed for Direct Appeal having PCR a conditional free hearing that follows Direct Appeal reversal of judgement = Jodi assumption.

[Lunarscope]

Jodi gets a free Direct Appeal to Arizona Supreme Court and a free PCR Appeal that's already been filed.

See court minutes for 08/10/2009 to find when Public Defenders Office and 2 Attornies informed the courts their refusal to continue representing Jodi.

JSS court minutes filed by Willmott was Not relating to Nurmi quitting Jodi' it related No conflict known' but since assigned council has not been reported, then the Public Defenders Office must have refused to again represent Jodi.

JSS had only 3 days mandated by Federal trial rules to name new council, but Federal trial rules also state Judges have leeway as to scheduling.

A PCR (can be filed at any time) asks for relief standalone or relief for Direct Appeals argumentation acceptance and reversal.

Unless JSS has assigned a Public Defender attorney and the information release is pending' time has expired, meaning JSS must assign a private practice appellate attorney for both lawsuits, PCR takes back-seat to Direct Appeal, because Direct can Moot PCR with being denied.

Direct appeals can only argue about 3 arguments or less' due to word-count restrictions and PCR (Jodi against Nurmi from pretrial to guilt phase' or against Nurmi entire trial) would back-seat to Direct Appeal decision.

------------------------------

A wrongful death lawsuit depends on restitution award judgement inadequacy, restitution or wrongful death do Not consider ability to pay, Alexander family trial involvement expenses are all recoverable, if Jodi fails to pay entire award, their are two options' Martinez can file causes for cause or wrongful death attorney can file charges.

The wrongful death attorney has been active since Travis's death and assists Martinez as a teammate with all discovery information, as I said FBI and DOJ have been filing information' how the filings are used or mothballed is their choice' or just priorities, we may or may not be informed if Government supplies data to Restitution ruling of if needed Wrongful death lawsuit.

Considering a 7 year spanse with over 2 years of court, for out of State family, a Restitution judgement should be more than any Jodi money, assuming a lot was compiled, restitution should be more, leaving Jodi to lose 55% of all mail money and earned working money.

Courts started deducting 19% off the top of all present and future money' except future earned wages, and the prison charges Jodi to bookwork her deductions for restitution, assume 1/2 a million and Jodi would not have the $250,000.00 for appeal attorney retainer' talking after June first hearing.

Also Jodi cannot afford a Civil attorney to protect her supporters best interest' leaving her supporters unprotected from experienced attornies who earn more by collecting more.

I don't believe a supporter can send Jodi money without being on her approved visitation list of 20 people' that would include minors who desire to visit Jodi. All money collected in Jodis name (fundraising) is subjected to 501 taxability, when IRS receives first 501 payment the collection process befalls scrutiny, any Jodi money unreported to IRS becomes forfeited with a $20,000.00 penalty.

[Lavender]

I found some new text msg. from JA to TA at http://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias
you have to scroll down to read, they were dated April 24, 28 thru May 2, 2008.
It seem that TA's Washington Mutual card is missing.. funny how JA was keeping
track.

[Lunarscope]

Yea' talk is Jodi went to Travis's panicking for to intercept his Bank Statement, = Roadtrip - Slaughtering, Travis was Suing Jodi for Car payments, Bank, Journal theft and chapter of his book theft, maybe stolen engagement ring - he had gave to a girl then break-up, then had the ring resized for I think Lisa' when Jodi took-it, plus her getting on his internet pages.

I was ready to post this;
Yahoo Answers' and the DP or no DP isn't in question or answers, the reality is only Anti-DP groups make more Appeals if sentenced to DP, although the 'Guaranteed' Direct Appeal afronts a PCR appeal resolution, theirs Not any difference (DP or Life) as far as free appeals, Arizona allows Jodi a free Direct Appeal and a free PCR appeal that is asking for relief relating to assumed Direct Appeal ruling reversal, their is a possibility of 3 free Jodi Appeals, only if the PCR is denied on all issues' that appeal can be subsequently advanced to the higher courts (often some issues must be eliminated) of Arizona Supreme Court = Same 5 Judge panel that a Direct Appeal is filed.

Jodi has 3 Arizona courts = JSS/Trial Court, 3 Judge/Appellate Court and 5 Judge/Arizona Supreme Court.
All Arizona appeals must be exhausted before Jodi can take her Case further = as I understand Arizona Law.

Jodi can keep appealing after her PCR appeal and Direct appeal if filed, then become denied, on her own dime' but she must keep back-to-back appealing, again as I understand Arizona Law.

Question is;

How many times can a convicted murderer appeal against his conviction and sentence?
Wondering, is there a limit to how many times a convicted murdered can appeal.

Best Answer (Chosen by Voter)

There is a time limit to start appeals of any sort. In my state 90 days. For murder the first appeal is automatic in most states.
The appeals court reviews the transcripts of the trail to find problems.
If the defense can find what they say is a problem with the original trail the start their appeals. Each time they are turned down the can appeal to a successively higher court. guilty in county court to state appeals court to state supreme court to local federal court (if the appeal is based on some sort of problem that is impacted by the constitution) to federal circuit court to US Supreme Court (the Supremes can decide if they want to hear the case or not. If they do not the district court ruling stands.
If any ruling goes against the prosecution they can also appeal the ruling.

Leslie S • 5 years
Comment 1 0
Other Answer

Well, theres a direct appeal, if all claims are denied it moves to whats usually called post conviction. You can raise certain issues in post conviction that are not normally proper in a direct appeal, things that were not ripe for review at that time. State direct appeals can pend for 2-3 years or so, post conviction claims can pend for 3-5 years in some cases. After that, what they can raise in a second or successive state post conviction claim is limited. They can file claims requesting DNA tests, they can file again if they plan to prove actual innocence, but they generally can't re-litigate claims already ruled on, but they usually try; nor can they raise claims they could have raised before, but chose not to; they can present claims with "new evidence" if due diligence or a proper investigation would not have been able to lead to them raising the claim before.

After the direct appeal, they can appeal the rulings on that to the US supreme court. After the state courts deny post conviction, the case becomes "Final" for the purposes of Federal law and you move to Federal Habeas proceedings, they normally MUST be filed within 1 year of the state conviction becoming Final, which is when the state denies post conviction relief. Sometimes they also make a usually futile petition to the state supreme court called an "all wris" petition, or sometimes just a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, but habeas corpus is the primary way state defendants use the Federal courts to seek relief.

Once the Federal habeas claim is filed, in the Federal district court, the judge usually holds a trial and makes his rulings. The federal inquiry is narrow, it's looking for State violations of Federal rights or obvious factual errors, it's not meant to be a new trial. These can take 4-5 years or more. Then it's appealed to the circuit court of appeals and then the US supreme court. Once this is denied, Federal courts will only entertain a second or successive habeas petition if it shows actual innocence.

Once both of those are exhausted, it's pretty much over. They can still raise claims, but almost none get much attention from the courts, unless theres new evidence.

---

Lavender; Your link only arrives at the main support page for me, can you repost, I want to read about their dating time, your posting, but cannot find who posted-it!

[Lavender]

(05-09-2015, 02:29 PM)Lunarscope Wrote:  Yea' talk is Jodi went to Travis's panicking for to intercept his Bank Statement, = Roadtrip - Slaughtering, Travis was Suing Jodi for Car payments, Bank, Journal theft and chapter of his book theft, maybe stolen engagement ring - he had gave to a girl then break-up, then had the ring resized for I think Lisa' when Jodi took-it, plus her getting on his internet pages.

I was ready to post this;
Yahoo Answers' and the DP or no DP isn't in question or answers, the reality is only Anti-DP groups make more Appeals if sentenced to DP, although the 'Guaranteed' Direct Appeal afronts a PCR appeal resolution, theirs Not any difference (DP or Life) as far as free appeals, Arizona allows Jodi a free Direct Appeal and a free PCR appeal that is asking for relief relating to assumed Direct Appeal ruling reversal, their is a possibility of 3 free Jodi Appeals, only if the PCR is denied on all issues' that appeal can be subsequently advanced to the higher courts (often some issues must be eliminated) of Arizona Supreme Court = Same 5 Judge panel that a Direct Appeal is filed.

Jodi has 3 Arizona courts = JSS/Trial Court, 3 Judge/Appellate Court and 5 Judge/Arizona Supreme Court.
All Arizona appeals must be exhausted before Jodi can take her Case further = as I understand Arizona Law.

Jodi can keep appealing after her PCR appeal and Direct appeal if filed,  then become denied, on her own dime' but she must keep back-to-back appealing, again as I understand Arizona Law.

Question is;

How many times can a convicted murderer appeal against his conviction and sentence?
Wondering, is there a limit to how many times a convicted murdered can appeal.

Best Answer (Chosen by Voter)

There is a time limit to start appeals of any sort. In my state 90 days. For murder the first appeal is automatic in most states.
The appeals court reviews the transcripts of the trail to find problems.
If the defense can find what they say is a problem with the original trail the start their appeals. Each time they are turned down the can appeal to a successively higher court. guilty in county court to state appeals court to state supreme court to local federal court (if the appeal is based on some sort of problem that is impacted by the constitution) to federal circuit court to US Supreme Court (the Supremes can decide if they want to hear the case or not. If they do not the district court ruling stands.
If any ruling goes against the prosecution they can also appeal the ruling.

Leslie S • 5 years
Comment 1 0
Other Answer

Well, theres a direct appeal, if all claims are denied it moves to whats usually called post conviction. You can raise certain issues in post conviction that are not normally proper in a direct appeal, things that were not ripe for review at that time. State direct appeals can pend for 2-3 years or so, post conviction claims can pend for 3-5 years in some cases. After that, what they can raise in a second or successive state post conviction claim is limited. They can file claims requesting DNA tests, they can file again if they plan to prove actual innocence, but they generally can't re-litigate claims already ruled on, but they usually try; nor can they raise claims they could have raised before, but chose not to; they can present claims with "new evidence" if due diligence or a proper investigation would not have been able to lead to them raising the claim before.

After the direct appeal, they can appeal the rulings on that to the US supreme court. After the state courts deny post conviction, the case becomes "Final" for the purposes of Federal law and you move to Federal Habeas proceedings, they normally MUST be filed within 1 year of the state conviction becoming Final, which is when the state denies post conviction relief. Sometimes they also make a usually futile petition to the state supreme court called an "all wris" petition, or sometimes just a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, but habeas corpus is the primary way state defendants use the Federal courts to seek relief.

Once the Federal habeas claim is filed, in the Federal district court, the judge usually holds a trial and makes his rulings. The federal inquiry is narrow, it's looking for State violations of Federal rights or obvious factual errors, it's not meant to be a new trial. These can take 4-5 years or more. Then it's appealed to the circuit court of appeals and then the US supreme court. Once this is denied, Federal courts will only entertain a second or successive habeas petition if it shows actual innocence.

Once both of those are exhausted, it's pretty much over. They can still raise claims, but almost none get much attention from the courts, unless theres new evidence.

---

Lavender; Your link only arrives at the main support page for me, can you repost, I want to read about their dating time, your posting, but cannot find who posted-it!

---

http://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias You have to scroll down to April 29, to the start of the msgs.
http://twitter.com/tdcj5895 he posted them.. I hope this helps.

---

Lunarscope, she talks about a man named Parker Stan, I found a Legal Shield LLP lawyer in Los Angeles, CA.
but full name is Parker Stanbury.

[Lunarscope]

I'd guess that would be the attorney' Jodi only discussed Travis's attorney notice of intent to being sued by Travis, she never signed hiring him (never put forth retainer) and that could relate a possibility of attorney not being willing to accept her as a client, PPL is mostly a free 1/2 hour consultant' and attorneys offer a free 1/2 hour consulting normally, theirs really no actual benefit.

Plus a PPL attorney likely wouldn't have accepted a lawsuit from Jodi with Travis being the one suing, I believe Jodi stole area of book that related to not connecting with psychos.

I do not reach understanding that Jodi dated Travis after early February break-up, I do think that after rock-climbing date by Travis Jodi crawled into Travis's bed naked, nothing else' just a wam-bam, I also think January was limited dating - Travis demanded money from Jodi for Lisa's 4 tires, and their was sex when she started paying, but Travis was done with - over Jodi - scared of her - tired of her games and thefts, but she wasn't working so he let her do a day or two of housecleaning, (thats before her leaving Mesa) I think he had new carpeting in his bedroom and closet installed' with closet shelfing improvement, and that would be the Jodi housekeeper reason. Threads in bathroom were carpet (new install) threads. Travis sold Jodi car to get rid of her, after she left he sold his other BMW for a Prius = e environmentally friendly hybrid car.
He could have borrowed money from Mimi or Chris but Travis was making nearly $15.000.00 monthly, he was starting a new business of selling religious garments. His days working consisted of calling people and PPL underlings.

I know Jodi premeditated excuses (journal) and after slaughter' edited-in excuses (journal), she used Travis's phone to send herself messages, deception was Jodi's standard mode of being.