End is Near Hopefully

[Lunarscope]

Nerm; 7 year ordeal with 2 year trial is a uniqueness' unprecedented, a circus trial was avoided if favor of a circus twitter trial' again unique, never has a victim been slaughtered in effigy before, again unique' again unprecedented!

@killerslie = reliable trial source; said a POC delay till 6/15 to release court transcribed minutes!
Relates to a delay for all three upcoming Jodi trials' Restitution, Verdict Appeal and PCR appeal. I wholeheartedly believe the DOJ and FBI are' from behind closed doors, routing resolve that will punish where punishment due.

Jodi had no mitigating arguments' just lies reinvented, trial was directed by JSS and the Buck stops at her. She was overruled for secret trial, and she then allowed secret testimony and secret witnesses (not to mention' both trials wrought with secret minutes' unprecedented in American law) and after her being overruled' she delayed releasing the secret for months, until the Defense was ready to rest its case, because their never were witnesses as wskiphl expected. Now we find out that the Sex tape was spliced from 7 phone calls' why was Martinez arguing (to jury) that Florez never received the Sex tape first, it is 100% illegal for evidence to be reviewed by the defense before the state, but JSS allowed, theirs no excuse, she trampled Constitution' numerously! She is done' out of there, nothing salvageable.

Martinez is a good Attorney' even a great Attorney. But his objections don't stop a trial, he don't play the Nurmi games and their will be Resolve, we also have his concern of Court employ Janet telling deliberating jury foreman Martinez should be stabbed 28 times (a death threat' during deliberations) and Murder 1 was overcharging of a Manslaughter, the Buck stops at JSS, Martinez has taken issue' to the powers that be..

The Restitution hearing is to Award compensation for for 2 things' Arizona restitution and Alexander family travel and out of pocket expenses' just for 2 years of trial is a huge amount' so a Snub is a Snub, is a Snub, the eminent Wrongful death verdict will supersede this JSS Restitution judgement, JSS can award Arizona courts a higher %age, remember restitution award is for both reasons and is based on Jodis possible life expectancy and has absolutely nothing to do with Jodis ability to pay, nothing to do with her available monies, court has prison take a % from all mail money and work money, talk is 55% maximum, but judgement can be a few hundred thousand. 20% of the jail money went into restitution on April 13th and that includes mail money.

The Alexander Wrongful Death Attorney will handle the Restitution hearing' but if equable Restitution was expected' you can bet the Alexander family would skip expensive' timely Wrongful Death trials lawsuit.

Their attendance denial' has nothing to do with seeing Jodi' even if Jodi changed her mind into deciding to attend, so No Jodi no Nurmi, only Martinez, JSS and Willmott, how can that be bothersome, prudence tells Alexander family expect a shortfall decision from JSS' JSS has no choice but to award damages' Jodi requires financial punishment to shut her up.

I never held any DP arguments' I only agreed with families goal, both sides have valid and invalid arguments against JSS, I only issue what Martinez issued by objections' or what happened with Juries, JSS not getting replaced mid-trial doesn't reduce her blame.
Had results been a DP their would have been 1 less free appeal' that's it' the Appeal to trial court or appellate court would have been eliminated by the Guaranteed Direct Appeal, if the tabled (to be tabled) appeal gets denied' Jodi gets to reword arguments = not change arguments' and appeal to Arizona Supreme Court = same thing as free DP appeal, all appeals follow up the courts courts, DP or not, Said because so many argue the nonsence' of DP's have endless appeals' argument' all have endless appealability' only if back to back' see anything except a DP first free' appeal and trial court free appeal can be returned as frivolous' meaning appeal denied, both Superior 3 judge and Supreme 5 judge can ignore review of appeal.

Justice' as I mentioned above trial minutes are in a delay theirs a date of the 15th' for release or for not being ready by that date for release, that's why Willmott asked for a delay' The appeal attorney is waiting for minutes to build case, so this fortifies a later delay request. Timelines drive the courts, delays are seldom denied, unless numerous, when appeal attorney has entire trial' we should get to review what becomes published, I want the minutes of Jurors in chambers with Jodi' that JSS allowed, unlikely because it will be extracurricular' in my opinion.

I read June 22nd, tweeted, For restitution the Alexander family had to request compensation and JSS can order their presence, that's quoting Arizona restitution hearings possibilities.
Unless the Alexander family wants to file Wrongful Death civil (not JSS) lawsuit, denying to supply receipts to JSS' saving!
Then using reciepts at restitution hearing.
That would leave JSS to use restitution for Arizona court expenses, Martinez has power to appeal restitution judgement' even if another attorney (appeal attorney) has involvement, but when a Civil Wrongful death case' Martinez isn't involved.

Jodi has been moved' and SW had sent choice tweets to Prison, while being a JII poster that glorifies Alexander family abuses, having her cake and eating it to!

I believe A bulk of court minutes will be released after June 15th, at least appeal Attorneys are awaiting till then, date was May 15th, I don't blame Willmott for the delay' my guess is JSS had Willmott file for delay or Willmott deserves a delay because JSS court is behind in supplying Appellate attorney the records.

[NERN]

Troy Hayden @troyhaydenfox10
·
Bcse u asked: Just spoke to AZDOC Director on a dif story, but he confirmed what ‪#‎jodiarias‬ said in letter. Freshly painted cell. Not blue.
#JodiArias cell moved to a dif spot in Lumley because of "intelligence" gathered by DOC. They would not comment on nature of information.

[Lavender]

Lunarscope, I found some new messages from TA.
http://www.nickvanderleek.com/2015/05/excerpt-from-vanity-long-awaited-sequel.html
Beth Karas gave her permission to print the.
Also @troyhadenfox10, Arias has been moved by DOC no reason given.

[Lunarscope]

Nern' the blue cells were all repainted' nothing to do with Jodi, and Lumley is a horseshoe shaped environment, the most used cells are the middle of horseshoe facing the guard station' offices, Jodi was moved to the far-most cell at one end' isolated from hearing cellmates. We can only guess if' moving her was to protect her from others (verbal threats) or to further restrict her activities.

Lavender' a good read, limited amount of words (Free from Beth) that further confirmes Travis only liked Jodi behind closed doors, also Jodi snooped Travis's personal posts' So she knew of the love-lost, She knew Travis was openly affectionate to worthily Ladies, Jodi was in no-way a Lady and Travis treated her as such, Jodi used owing Travis to keep him communicating with her, he obviously reached his financial limit when the BMW was trashed, I wonder if Travis gave Jodi his more valuable BMW of the 2, he sold his other BMW for a expensive new edition hybrid in that few weeks.

If the Jodi letter was not smuggled out of Perryville (paper had a perryville issue watermark), then someone inside supplied the blank paper to Jodi before April 13th. Or whoever visited Jodi after her 30 of mandatory solitary.
Note; Using the word Solitary is Not on par with how things work, we have a Perryville classified definition, it's pages long and has some backtracking of possible uses, in short All Classified can ask for reductions and They do what they do, Jodi will Not be on 2 years of Solitary with good behavior, actually it's best to assume their efficient' to avoid confusion.

Jodi is now in what's called 'Segregation' and the segregation cells offer less books and/or available electronics, maybe less windows' it is definitely a punishment, because if cellmates were bothering' then they not Jodi would be segregated.

After the 30 days that Jodi served in solitary' She now has the Duty to Work, Not a privilege.

All punishments for very bad behavior at Perryville (if strict punishment is decided) has the same 30 in (Segragrated = solitary isn't best word), as Jodi had getting there, we will never know how many cellmates neighbors Jodi has at Lumbly, except for the few we known about.

The end cells in the horseshoe at Lumbly' are used for segregated punishment (30 day), so the segregation' if entire 30 = days Jodi punishment, may have reasoned delay of upcoming trial = legal team cannot communicate with Jodi.

Counting the over 30 day of Jodi in Solitary in Jail, that followed April 13th,, Jodi will have nearly 100 days in Segregation in less than 110 days,

[Lunarscope]

https://justiceandretribution.wordpress.com/2015/05/06/appeals-process-the-alexanders-wrongful-death-suit/

APPEALS PROCESS AND THE ALEXANDERS’ WRONGFUL DEATH SUIT

Again with Sarah' I don't 100% agree, she is young from a family of Attorneys, and has 1 year legal training so far, this is very very good' but all possible complications are not explained!

Jodi gets 1 free appeal that can be appealed (if JSS denies) to higher Arizona appeal = Twice appealed, and Jodi early filed a PCR appeal, it would Moot if free appeal is denied.
If Jodi argues four arguments and 3 are denied = dismissed, the one accepted is a win at appeal, any higher court appeal granting reverts to JSS to hold rehashing. DP appeal process is the same only a Guarantee appeal starts with Arizona Supreme Court, JSS would still judge, Sarah is wrong DP convictions have endless appeals, if anything theirs one less state appeal. Anti DP advocates do free as appealing, (wouldn't help Jodi) if client cooperation.

Again Sarah explains great, the Wrongful Death will advance on a faster pace' than she expects, all researching already compiled.

May 6, 2015 SarahGee1987 appeals, habeas corpus, jodi arias, jodi arias trial, justice for travis, post-conviction relief, travis alexander, wrongful death;


I decided to put together a little blurb about what the appeals process entails for anyone who is curious, or for anyone who is just generally unfamiliar with the appeal process. I also included some information regarding the Alexander family’s wrongful death civil suit, for anyone who is interested.

Here is the general sequence of appellate procedure for criminal convictions:



Jodi has ONE direct appeal as a matter of constitutional right, and she has been appointed new attorneys who are appellate defenders. Once you are appointed appellate counsel, your trial attorneys are no longer involved with your case (Jodi filed her first notice of appeal on 4/20/2015, so Wilmott and Nurmi are officially free of her– yay for them). This is the only appeal that is free, and if she loses (which she obviously will), she will then have to pay out-of-pocket for any further appeals. It is incredibly difficult to get a conviction reversed on direct appeal, especially when there is DNA evidence. Jodi is going to have a hell of a time with this because she left a hell of a lot of DNA. She also can’t really argue ineffective assistance of counsel– Nurmi pretty much eliminated this as an appellate issue by basically picking motions out of his nose all day everyday.

It’s safe to say that Jodi will lose on direct appeal. If she wants to, she can submit this appeal further along on the legal chain– to the Arizona Supreme Court– but they are even more stringent than the appellate courts, and they most likely will not even glance at her appeal. All this will do is prolong the direct appeal rejection process. The entire direct appeal process– from when she files her first notice, until the Supreme Court Justice laughs her appeal off of his/her bench– will take approximately 18 months. After Jodi loses on direct appeal, she has no more appeals as a matter of constitutional right. This means that Jodi can continue appealing, but she has to pay out-of-pocket. Since nobody is going to want to represent Jodi for free, she is going to have to raise a lot of money (on average, they run upwards of $250,000). So if she can afford it, she can proceed in two ways:

1) A post-conviction appeal: this appeal is filed in state court, and it is the original trial judge (Judge Sherry Stephens) who makes the ruling. Judge Stephens will probably say that she will “take it under advisement,” which means it will sit on her desk for awhile until she formally issues a rejection. In order to get a reversal on post-conviction, you need brand new evidence that was not & could not have been discovered during the first trial. A good example of this is DNA testing. When DNA testing was first developed in the late 1980’s/early 1990’s, it resulted in numerous overturned convictions because: 1) it constituted brand new evidence that exonerated the guilty parties; and 2) it constituted evidence that could not have been discovered during the original trials (obviously because the trials took place prior to the inception of DNA testing).

Suffice it to say that Jodi Arias will lose on post-conviction. There is no way that Judge Stephens will reverse her conviction. She spent two long years enduring Jodi’s bullshit- she knows Jodi well and what she is capable of. Interestingly, according to Troy Hayden, Judge Stephens really wanted Jodi to get the death penalty (I can’t verify the validity of this, other than I heard it from Troy who heard it from his sources, so take it at face value). I don’t think I need to elaborate any more on why this appeal will be rejected. Once Judge Stephens rejects Jodi’s post-conviction petition, Jodi will file for an appeal against Judge Stephen’s ruling, and that will be summarily denied by the higher courts. After that, Jodi will then most likely file for a federal writ of habeas corpus.

2) Federal writ of habeas corpus: this is the final avenue for which Jodi can appeal, and if she is not successful, then her case is closed. She can no longer appeal after this, period. This not much different from the other appeals; the primary difference is that it takes place in the Federal Courts. It is also the most stringent in terms of prerequisites that are necessary for a reversal to take place. In order for a conviction to be reversed at the federal level, there must be a constitutional violation that occurred at trial, combined with brand new evidence that was not & could not have been discovered at trial.

The federal writ of habeas corpus will be rejected fairly quickly. Rarely is it that a conviction is overturned at the federal level when there was forensic evidence at the crime scene. Also, there more than likely will not be any brand new evidence– if there is, it will probably just make her look even more guilty. There were no constitutional violations either. Again, she cannot claim ineffective assistance of counsel, thanks to Nurmi. If anything, the general public’s constitutional rights were violated when Judge Stephens banned us from the courtroom. The entire appeals process will take about 2-3 years (from when the first direct appeal is filed, until the final appeal is rejected). After this, Jodi can no longer appeal, period. This is the one positive aspect about her getting LWOP instead of the death penalty; if she got the death penalty, the appeals would never stop. With LWOP, she only has the above-mentioned avenues to appeal, and if they are all rejected, she can’t do anything else. She just has to suck-it-up and grow comfortable with the fact that her lying, manipulative, murderous ass is stuck behind bars forever. Also, because she no longer can appeal, there is no legitimate reason to have a canteen fund “legal defense fund,” or some obscure variant thereof.

Just a few quick things about the Alexanders and their civil suit…..

The Alexander family is going to win a huge verdict from their wrongful death suit. This is fairly obvious. In order to win a civil case, you don’t need to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt; you just need to prove it by a “preponderance of evidence,” meaning that you just have to show it is more probable than not that the defendant caused a wrongful death (slightly more than 50% or greater). However, because the criminal trial yielded proof beyond a reasonable doubt, then by default it is implied that the evidence has been proven beyond a preponderance.

Once a verdict is rendered, (wrongful death cases take ~2 years usually) there will be a hearing to enforce judgment. There is going to be a gargantuan verdict, in range of OJ Simpson, because people hate her so much. The more hated you are, the bigger the verdict (OJ Simpson, the national mascot for wrongful death verdicts, had to pay over $30 million in damages).
The Alexander family’s attorneys will start investigating and seizing assets, piercing trusts, etc. They will be able to find any and all funds linked to Jodi, whether onshore or offshore, and seize them. If the trust/account is not in Jodi’s name, they will investigate to see if it is linked to Jodi in any way, and if so, they will take it.
In civil cases, the only trusts that can be protected from seizure are those that are set-up for the children of the deceased person. Since Travis and Jodi were not married and had no children, there is no legitimate reason for any trust to be protected from the Alexanders. Also, Jodi’s family members cannot shelter her money in a trust. After a verdict is rendered, all family members’ trusts will be investigated (they can rightfully do this when judgement is enforced), and if any trusts are linked to Jodi, they will most likely be seized.
Even if Jodi had a legal defense fund, no court in Arizona is going to allow for more than $100,000 for the direct appeal, and the same will be true for the post-conviction/habeas. So, if hundreds of thousands, or millions of dollars, are put into a “legal defense fund” for her, and a civil verdict is entered, the majority WILL go to the Alexanders.
If Jodi was given the death penalty, then about $2 million would have been expended on her appeal. But for LWOP, it will be like a blue-light special at Walmart in terms of legit legal fees.
Also, if Jodi cannot chalk up enough money to retain an attorney, and the money in the “legal defense fund” ends up not being used for legal purposes, it will go to the Alexanders.
These attorneys will not leave any assets left behind. These are smart-ass attorneys too— it is not like hidden or offshore assets are going to be a challenge for them to find (and let’s face it— peeps in Jodi’s circle just aren’t the brightest bulbs). It’s not as simple as putting trust in someone else’s name.
Also, anyone involved in hiding or protecting assets for Jodi could potentially be prosecuted under federal law. Any criminal enterprise that contributes legal fees could be subjected to charges under RICO and money laundering federal statutes, as well as tax law violations if deductions are sought.
I’ve been getting a lot of queries about Jodi’s trusts in comparisons to OJ Simpson’s. Here is the simple answer: in addition to having five children for which he had set-up trusts for, OJ was acquitted and had several years to dispose of assets before the civil verdict. The laws that allowed him to move assets were also subsequently repealed. He was also rich to start off with and had already sheltered assets before the murder because of his divorce.

Thanks for reading! Good luck & keep writing those checks, Jodi-supporters. :-)

——

A little side note:

Arizona Law recognizes what is called “Anders Law.” If Jodi asks for appointed counsel, she runs the risk of an “Anders Brief” being filed. This means that the appellate defenders office tells the court that they cannot in good faith file an appeal on her behalf because they found “no meritorious issues,” and then the court dismisses the appeal. She can still appeal after that, but she then also has to appeal the Anders Brief issue, which will weaken her case even more– before she can appeal, she will have to get counsel to argue that there are actually meritorious issues and that her case is not “wholly frivolous.” I’m not saying that this will necessarily happen, but if it does, it will just be another fun hurdle for Jodi. For more information, look-up “State v. Thompson – Supreme Court.”

[Lavender]

Lunarscope,
In order to file an Anders brief (also called a "no-merits brief"), the attorney must do the following:

The attorney must file a motion to withdraw as the defendant's counsel.
The motion to withdraw must "be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal." Any and all grounds, even if counsel considers them frivolous, must be raised in the brief. Those grounds include areas such as a plea of guilty was made voluntarily and freely, or the sentence imposed by the court was within the permissible range.
The defendant should be given a copy of the brief and given time to raise any grounds (either pro se or by other counsel) that the defendant so chooses to raise.
The court must then independently "after a full examination of all the proceedings" decide if the appeal is wholly frivolous. If the court decides it is, then it is to grant counsel's motion to withdraw and then (depending on state law) either dismiss the appeal or rule on its merits, but must still allow the defendant to further appeal if desired. If the court, though, finds that there is at least one non-frivolous ground, it must then allow the defendant the right to make the case and appoint counsel if needed. (As part of an Anders brief, an attorney may request that, if the court finds a non-frivolous ground(s) for appeal, the attorney be allowed to withdraw the brief and remain as counsel, whereupon the attorney would then amend the appeal to argue on the ground(s) that the court has found.)
I think the letter that was leaked was on purpose for the Haters, everything is just great like the best vacay she has ever been on. She
mentions DM a few times like she was also wrongfully convicted. She is using reverse psych. Everything is not great and she knows it.
I read some of the State v. Thompson the cases are totally different, wasn't premed. but he killed a PO. but his appeal was pointless.

[Lavender]

Lunarscope, I found JA's secret testimony video at,
http://www.thegoldpatrol.com

[Lavender]

lunarscope, look up Connick v. Thompson 03/29/11 supreme court
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/30/us/30scotus.html?_r=o

[Lavender]

Letter from SH to KN
ourfriendtravis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Letter-to-Defense.png
Also Sheriff Joe told @troyhaydenfox10 full report of jail transgressions to be released one day next week.

[Justice]

(05-21-2015, 04:32 PM)Lavender Wrote:  Letter from SH to KN
ourfriendtravis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Letter-to-Defense.png
Also Sheriff Joe told @troyhaydenfox10 full report of jail transgressions to be released one day next week.

To be released "next week". I wonder what year...........